Bird & Bird Electronics Update

 

April 2012
 
Electronics.jpg
ELEC0002_WEB_590X200_jpg.jpg

Welcome

In this edition of the Electronics Update we discuss the recent decision of the German Federal Supreme Court in Motorola vs Apple, which increases the threshold for invoking an Orange Book defence in infringement proceedings and the "fair play" doctrine for standard-essential patents resulting from two decisions in the Netherlands.

We also have a report on the CJEU judgement in Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV vs Nokia Corporation, dealing with Anti-Piracy Regulations and goods in transit and updates on the substantial amendments to the Polish Civil Procedure Code which will come into force on 3 May 2012, and the decision of the European Commission in Microsoft's acquisition of Skype.

Finally, from our UK office, we have a report on the opinion of AG Bot on the scope of protection for computer software in SAS Institute Inc. v World Programming Ltd (Case C-406/10) and in our "In Brief" section we provide an update on some key developments in the electronics sector.

Should you have any comments or require any further information do not hesitate to contact either the editors or, if you prefer, your local office. Contact details are provided at the bottom of the update.


German court increases threshold for invoking an Orange Book defence in infringement proceedings
Martin Jäger
In a recent decision published in December 2011 concerning patent infringement proceedings initiated by Motorola Mobility Inc. (Motorola) against Apple Sales International (Apple), the District Court in Mannheim has further developed the preconditions necessary for a defendant to raise an Orange Book defence against an infringement injunction (7th Civil Chamber of the Mannheim District Court, Decision rendered on 9 December 2011, Docket-No. 7 O 122/11). In a provisional order of the appeal court, the Higher Regional Court in Karlsruhe, Apple's motion to temporarily suspend the execution of the Mannheim court decision was rejected. As a result some of the new preconditions set by the Mannheim Court have been further assessed and in part confirmed (6th Civil Senate of the Higher Regional Court Karlsruhe, Order rendered on 23 January 2012, Docket-No. 6 U 136/11).

Polish Civil Procedure will now be more entrepreneur-friendly
Krzysztof Korwin-Kossakowski

After a long debate, on 16 September 2011, the Polish Parliament adopted substantial amendments to the Polish Civil Procedure Code of 17 October 1964 (the "KPC"). The changes come into force on 3 May 2012. 


Netherlands: 'Fair Play', a new rule for standard-essential patents?
Armand Killan and Maurits Westerik

The Netherlands is one of the primary logistic 'gateways to Europe' and has a large amount of cargo traffic, both in bulk goods, consumer goods and high-end electronics. As a result, the country offers several interesting strategic options for asserting intellectual property rights. Active and experienced Dutch Customs provide strong border detention programs, while preliminary injunctions and accelerated patent proceedings allow for fast-paced patent litigation. Additionally, the Netherlands offers the option of pre-judgment seizures, whereby the infringing goods are seized at the place where infringing goods are located or held in detention. This is a specifically Dutch legal instrument that can 'lock down' distribution stock located in the Netherlands, even if it has already passed through Customs.


Commission approves Microsoft/Skype

Geoffroy van de Walle de Ghelcke and Laura Holt
On 7 October 2011, the European Commission unconditionally cleared Microsoft's acquisition of Skype. The published decision is interesting as it seems to mark a departure from key theories which the Commission relied upon in its earlier antitrust cases against Microsoft.


Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV and Nokia Corporation CJEU Judgment
Manon Rieger-Jansen and Matthijs Marell
On 1 December 2011, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered an important judgment on the Anti-Piracy Regulation (APR) and goods in transit. The CJEU outlined the circumstances in which goods sent from a non-EU Member State that infringe intellectual property rights in the EU may be detained by the customs authorities of Member States. The CJEU also provided guidance as to when these goods actually infringe intellectual property rights in the EU, whether in transit or in a customs authority warehouse. The CJEU also elaborated on the possible grounds to act against 'counterfeit' goods other than the APR.


Copyright protection for computer programs
Alice Sculthorpe
In a reference to the Court of Justice of the EU ("CJEU") from the UK High Court, AG Bot in SAS Institute Inc. v World Programming Ltd (Case C-406/10) has delivered his opinion on the scope of protection for computer software, viewing that the functionality of a computer program and the programming language are not eligible as such for copyright protection.


In Brief
Peter Ward


Amendments to Radio Spectrum Harmonisation Conditions For Use By Short-Range Devices
 

BEREC Report And Guidelines For Net Neutrality


OFCOM - Auction of 4G Radio Spectrum

 

First Annual Progress Report on the European Commission's Digital Agenda for Europe

 

The European Commission Launches A Public Consultation On Its Draft Guide To Good Practice In Public Procurement Of ICT


Contact Us

Belgium Bruno Vandermeulen bruno.vandermeulen@twobirds.com
China and Hong Kong

Matthew Laight

Alison Wong

matthew.laight@twobirds.com

alison.wong@twobirds.com

Czech Republic Vojtech Chloupek   vojtech.chloupek@twobirds.com
Finland Pekka Raatikainen pekka.raatikainen@twobirds.com
France    Alexandre Vuchot alexandre.vuchot@twobirds.com
Germany

Alexander Duisberg

Oliver Jan Jüngst   

alexander.duisberg@twobirds.com

oliver.jan.juengst@twobirds.com

Hungary Titusz Puskár titusz.puskar@twobirds.com
Italy Massimiliano Mostardini massimiliano.mostardini@twobirds.com
The Netherlands

Wouter Pors

Armand Killan

wouter.pors@twobirds.com

armand.killan@twobirds.com

Poland Maciej Gawronski maciej.gawronski@twobirds.com
Singapore Alban Kang alban.kang@twobirds.com
Slovakia Martin Maxa martin.maxa@twobirds.com
Spain Javier Fernandez-Samaniego javier.samaniego@twobirds.com
Sweden

Johan Tyden

Walo von Greyerz

johan.tyden@twobirds.com

walo.vongreyerz@twobirds.com

UK

Mark Heaney

Katharine Stephens

Graeme Maguire

mark.heaney@twobirds.com

katharine.stephens@twobirds.com

graeme.maguire@twobirds.com

Editors:
UK

Mark Heaney

Alice Sculthorpe

Laura Holt

Lorna Brazell

mark.heaney@twobirds.com

alice.sculthorpe@twobirds.com

laura.holt@twobirds.com  

lorna.brazell@twobirds.com    


The content of this update is of general interest and is not intended to apply to specific circumstances. The content should not, therefore, be regarded as constituting legal advice and should not be relied on as such. In relation to any particular problem which they may have, readers are advised to seek specific advice. Further, the law may have changed since first publication and the reader is cautioned accordingly.

BIRD & BIRD

Bird & Bird is an international legal practice comprising Bird & Bird LLP and its affiliated and associated businesses. Bird & Bird LLP is a limited liability partnership, registered in England and Wales with registered number OC340318 and is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Its registered office and principal place of business is at 15 Fetter Lane, London EC4A 1JP.

For details of Bird & Bird, our offices, our members, the use of e-mail and regulatory information, please see twobirds.com and, in particular, twobirds.com/english/Legal_Notices.cfm.

The word "partner" is used to refer to a member of Bird & Bird LLP or an employee or consultant, or to a partner, member, director, employee or consultant in any of its affiliated businesses, who has equivalent standing and qualifications. A list of members of Bird & Bird LLP and of any non-members who are designated as partners, and of their respective professional qualifications, is open to inspection at our London office address.

All such persons are solicitors, registered foreign lawyers or non-registered European lawyers.