ICO: Legal Classification of Tokens – Update BaFin’s view

Depending on the rights a Token conveys, it can be a Security Token, a Currency Token, a Utility Token or take a hybrid form. Legal literature and regulatory practice can at times diverge.

more on Blockchain/DLT applications on our Blockchain In-Focus page.

In our article on legal classification of tokens we express our view that a crucial prerequisite for the classification as securities is the possibility of a bona fide acquisition. This view is based on legal literature, explanatory memoranda of courts, and reflects the need for finality and confidence in the capital markets.

However, in its journal, BaFin expresses the opinion that a statutory bona fide acquisition shall not be required for the classification as securities (nevertheless, the opposite view is expressed on BaFin’s website on prospectus requirements (English)). To BaFin the defining factor is only the negotiability of the respective product (e.g. a token). If the tokens of an ICO or STO represent the same kind of rights and can be determined by type and numbers, BaFin is likely to accept they meet the criteria of negotiability. Through this paradigm shift, BaFin creates a “security sui generis” to capture all security tokens as securities under prospectus requirements.

It remains to be seen whether BaFin’s approach will find judicial confirmation should a court be asked to adjudicate. Just last year, BaFin’s approach to qualify Bitcoin as financial instruments was challenged by Berlin’s superior court of justice.

Latest insights

More Insights
Suspension bridge over water at sunset

Five Key Considerations for M&A in the Retail and Consumer Sector

Jun 28 2024

Read More
Curiosity line green background

Are you ready for Hong Kong’s Cybersecurity law?

Jun 28 2024

Read More
Snow-capped mountain range

Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 – Implications of the UK Act for Australian companies

Jun 28 2024

Read More