Huawei v ZTE Five Years After—Luxembourg Locuta Causa Finita?

Written By

stephan waldheim module
Dr. Stephan Waldheim

Partner
Germany

I am a partner in competition law. I specialise in transactions, commercial disputes, IP, IT and compliance. My sector focus is on the automotive supply industry, tech & comms, consumer electronics and on regulated industries. I strive to add value to my client's businesses by providing legal advice that can be used to achieve measurable business objectives.

Very few judgements from the EU level have reshaped daily court practice like Huawei vs. ZTE did for standard-essential patent (‘SEP’) litigation. Five years after, the national courts have had ample opportunity to adjust and to advance their view on how to transpose the Court of Justice of the European Union’s (‘CJEU’) landmark decision.

Questions dealt with include most notably:

  • Does every SEP necessarily confer dominance to its holder?
  • How detailed does an infringement notice need to be, particularly if a portfolio license is sought after?
  • When can the patent owner safely conclude that the user is an unwilling licensee and the seeking of an injunction thus justified?
  • And, most importantly, how to determine a fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (‘FRAND’) license offer.

This paper gives an overview of the current state of play and of the questions that (appear to) remain open todate.

This article was originally published by 'Oxford University Press - Journal of European Competition Law & Pracitice', 24 April 2020.

Read the original article here >

Latest insights

More Insights
power station

UK Supreme Court grants anti-suit injunction and re-affirms Enka upholding parties’ agreement to arbitrate

Nov 20 2024

Read More
featured image

Latest Trends in M&A in Europe by Japanese Companies

4 minutes Nov 19 2024

Read More
Carabiner

Update: Reform of product liability adopted - New liability and litigation risks for companies!

Nov 19 2024

Read More