What is happening?
In November 2015, the Financial Conduct Authority ("FCA") issued its anticipated draft guidance to help firms and service providers understand its expectations when outsourcing to the cloud and other third party IT services ("Guidance").
The Guidance is in consultation phase with responses due by 12 February 2016. It is neither exhaustive nor binding but it provides a valuable insight into a previously unclear area, in particular:
Following completion of this phase, the FCA intends to publish final guidance on its website.
Why now?
Since its creation in 2013, the FCA has campaigned for greater innovation and competition in the financial services sector based on the premise that this will create better financial services for consumers. So, it is no surprise that it is now focusing on promoting the use of (relatively) innovative digital technologies like cloud computing. This focus is very welcome; cloud computing has been around for years and other regulators (for example, in the US and the Netherlands) have either published guidance or approved the use of certain aspects of cloud computing in the financial services many years ago.
The FCA views the proper use of outsourcing to the cloud (and other third party IT services) as part of this campaign: it can help promote the emergence of new entrants (thereby reducing concentration risk issues where the market is dependent on a limited number of service providers) and encourage firms to look at more cost-effective ways to renew legacy IT systems (e.g. by replacing on-premise solutions with cloud-based ones which could lead to cost savings that could be passed down to consumers).
Another trigger for producing this more detailed Guidance is the FCA's recognition (following roundtable discussions with stakeholders) that whilst cloud services undertaken on behalf of a regulated firm may constitute outsourcing, the risks associated with these projects differ from traditional outsourcing projects (e.g. commoditised cloud services mean less scope for amendments). So, the existing rules will apply but the Guidance is designed to provide firms with help when considering how to apply them in the cloud context.
What does it cover?
The Guidance covers outsourcing to the cloud and other third party IT service providers ("service providers"). It sets out a detailed list of considerations for firms covering the full lifecycle from pre-contract tasks (e.g. evaluation of service provider suitability) to contract management (e.g. day to day service provider monitoring) and exit planning. The key principles underpinning these considerations are the identification and management of operational risks associated with using third parties.
Cloud is defined broadly: "private, public or hybrid cloud, as well as Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), Platform as a Services (PaaS) and Software as a Service (SaaS)." Based on this definition most (if not, all) cloud models will be captured by the Guidance.
Key takeaways
The FCA has set out 13 considerations.
The Guidance should not be read in isolation. Since the FCA has confirmed cloud service offerings as a form of outsourcing, regulated firms (in addition to taking account of the Guidance) need to ensure the terms they agree with service providers align with the general outsourcing requirements dotted throughout the FCA Handbook (including the specific guidance in the SYSC 8 chapter) either to comply with mandatory rules or in order to align with recognised best practice. In fact, some of the Guidance maps to the SYSC 8 requirements (e.g. guidance around effective access to data and business premises).
Legal and regulatory:
Risk management / international standards / data security:
Oversight:
Data protection:
Effective access to data / access to business premises:
Change management: firms should agree comprehensive procedures to govern changes so that new risks are not introduced as services are changed. Continuity and business planning / exit plan: firms should have in place robust procedures to ensure continuity of service in the event of an unforeseen disruption to the outsourced services. This could include business continuity planning, step-in rights (if practical), identifying the appropriateness of insourcing activities and effective exit planning procedures to ensure seamless transition to a new service provider if necessary. Resolution: the outsourced services should be organised in a way that does not create additional complexity or a barrier to the resolution or orderly wind-down of the firm. |
What next?
One of the aims of the Guidance is to provide insights into how an innovative technology like cloud computing can be utilised by firms in a manner that is aligned with the existing regulatory rules that apply to more traditional outsourcing projects. The FCA stated how, in the lead up to publishing the Guidance, "we have been working to identify areas where our regulatory framework needs to adapt to enable further innovation…" The Guidance is a very welcome approval of the use of cloud (which should hopefully lead to more uptake in this area by firms who, in the absence of clear guidance, were reluctant to adopt cloud solutions). It aligns with the work being undertaken by the FCA's Project Innovate to help provide support for FinTech start-ups eager to understand the regulatory framework and provide services in the newly "digitised" financial services sector, whilst also providing much-needed clarity to the financial services institutions looking for more certainty on how to plan their cloud strategy.
We suspect further refinements will be made as regulated firms, service providers and other stakeholders seek to provide input during the consultation phase. In fact, we plan to provide input into the call for comments on the Guidance based on our market experience. If you would like to input into our submission please get in contact with the author.