Deconstructing Actavis v Eli Lilly

The Supreme Court's decision in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2017] UKSC 48 has changed the way that the UK courts will determine the extent of protection of a patent's claim. Prior to this decision, since the House of Lords' decision in Catnic Components v Hill [1982] RPC 183 the UK courts has used "purposive construction" in order to establish the scope of a patent's claim.

As famously explained by Lord Hoffmann in the seminal decision of the House of Lords in Kirin Amgen v Hoechst Marion Roussel [2005] RPC 9 the crux of purposive construction is to determine "what the person skilled…

Full article available on PatentHub

Latest insights

More Insights
featured image

The possible end of the Green Claims Directive: Is it all Greenwashing now?

4 minutes Jun 26 2025

Read More
featured image

UK Court of Appeal overturns refusal of interim injunction against generic companies

6 minutes Jun 26 2025

Read More
Ferris wheel

Horizon Scanning 2025/2026

Jun 25 2025

Read More