Singapore Court: setting aside a portion of an arbitral award (BAZ v BBA)

Written By

shaun lee module
Shaun Lee

Partner
Singapore

As a partner in our Dispute Resolution Group in Singapore, I act regularly for our private sector and governmental clients in high-value complex transnational commercial and regulatory disputes across the TMT and financial sectors, as well as in the infrastructure, energy & utilities space.

mark ng module
Mark Ng

Senior Associate
Singapore

I am a senior associate in our Dispute Resolution Group in Singapore, and have represented clients in various high-value, cross-border, commercial litigation and international arbitrations.

BAZ v BBA and others and other matters [2018] SGHC 275 This arbitration analysis examines the Singapore High Court’s decision in BAZ v BBA and the implications of having a portion of an international arbitration award set aside as being contrary to a country’s public policy on the rest of the award and on the parties to the award.

Latest insights

More Insights
Curiosity line blue background

Foreign Direct Investment in Australia: A Year in Review and Looking Ahead to 2025

Feb 20 2025

Read More
Curiosity line teal background

Accounting for tariffs in commercial contracting: Practical considerations

Feb 18 2025

Read More
Curiosity line green background

ASIC v Macleod: Lessons for privilege in Voluntary Disclosures to Regulators

Feb 13 2025

Read More