Australia: A costly cup of coffee

Written By

thomas jones Module
Thomas Jones

Partner
Australia

As a partner in our Competition and Commercial Groups in Sydney, and co-head of the Technology and Communications Group in Australia, I specialise in cross-jurisdictional regulatory issues in technology and communications.

matthew bovaird Module
Matthew Bovaird

Special Counsel
Australia

I am a Special Counsel in the Commercial Group based in our Sydney office. I specialise in advising our clients within the technology and communications sector.

The ACCC has recently announced that it will bring civil proceedings against an Australian company and its director for alleged cartel conduct. According to ACCC’s press release, the conduct related to a 2019 tender for the replacement of a smart building management system at the National Gallery.  Allegedly, an executive tried to fix the price of bids to be submitted by the company and its competitor in response to the National Gallery’s tender.



The attempt allegedly occurred over a cup of coffee in a Canberra café.

Cartel conduct is the most serious infringement under Australia’s competition laws and includes bid rigging, price fixing, market sharing and output restrictions.  Unlike many other provisions of the competition law which require a substantial lessening of competition, cartel conduct ‘per se’ is an offence and can attract criminal sanctions.

The ACCC and the Australian Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions have been involved in a number of high-profile cartel matters over the last year.  These include a criminal conviction of Norwegian shipping company, Wallenius Wilhelmsen Ocean AS, which was ordered to pay a fine of A$24M, an ongoing criminal prosecution of Country Care, and continuing pre-trial applications in the alleged “bank cartel”.

What is of interest here is that the ACCC decided to pursue the company in circumstances where the cartel was not formed, let alone given effect to. It is a salutary reminder that a (failed) attempt can be enough.

The ACCC is seeking pecuniary penalties, injunctions, declarations and costs, in addition to an order disqualifying an executive from managing a company.

It could be a very expensive cup of coffee.

Latest insights

More Insights

California’s AI bill vs. the EU AI Act: a cross-continental analysis of AI regulations

Nov 06 2024

Read More
Keyboard and tablet on yellow background

New consumer rights in the Polish Electronic Communications Law

3 min Nov 05 2024

Read More
Competition and EU

Competitive Edge: Competition & EU Law - FDI special edition - October 2024

Oct 30 2024

Read More