Case Update: Epic Games, Inc v Apple Inc: choice of forum clauses and public policy grounds – Epic Games, Inc v Apple Inc [2021] FCAFC 122

Written By

emma croft Module
Emma Croft

Senior Associate
Australia

I am a senior associate in our Dispute Resolution Group in Sydney, specialising in media and technology disputes, commercial litigation and privacy and cybersecurity advisory work.

On 9 July 2021, the Federal Court of Australia overturned a decision to award a stay based on an exclusive jurisdiction/choice of forum clause on the basis that public policy considerations require that most claims brought under Part IV of the Competition and Consumer Law Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA) should be determined in Australia.

The practical implication of this decision is that while companies should be aware of any exclusive jurisdiction or choice of forum clauses in agreements they enter into, they should also be aware that there may be some limited instances, including where a claim is brought under Part IV of the CCA, where there are “strong reasons” to allow the suit to proceed in Australia instead.

Read the full article here >

Latest insights

More Insights
featured image

In Cyberspace no one can hear you scream –Cybersecurity in the Media and Entertainment sector

8 minutes Feb 20 2025

Read More
books

An “AI Playbook for the UK Government” has been released by the UK Government Digital Service – 5 key questions answered

Feb 14 2025

Read More
camera

“Shambles” TV show format not protected by copyright as a dramatic work

Feb 12 2025

Read More