Epic Games, Inc v Apple Inc: choice of forum clauses to which parties have ‘no choice’ – Epic Games, Inc v Apple Inc (Stay Application) [2021] FCA 338
Written By
Senior Associate
Australia
I am a senior associate in our Dispute Resolution Group in Sydney, specialising in media and technology disputes, commercial litigation and privacy and cybersecurity advisory work.
Related
Practices
Sectors
Regions
Countries
On 9 April 2021, the Federal Court of Australia stayed proceedings brought by Epic Games against Apple for various breaches of the Competition and Consumer Law Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA) on the basis of a clause in the underlying agreement between the parties requiring that all disputes be heard by courts in the Northern District of California.
The practical implication of this decision is that companies should be aware of any choice of law clauses in agreements they enter into. This applies even in respect of standard form contracts where they have ‘no choice but to agree’ to the terms, unless the company has concrete evidence that the relevant international court would decline to hear the matter.
Read the full article here >
Latest insights
More Insights
Australia: cost of living in focus as ACCC targets supermarkets, essential services, and misleading pricing in 2025-26 enforcement priorities
Feb 26 2025
Lights, Camera, Rebate! The new 35%++ Abu Dhabi Film Rebate (and key legal considerations when filming in the United Arab Emirates)
6 minutes Feb 25 2025
Australia’s Privacy Regulator releases new guidance on artificial intelligence (AI)
Feb 25 2025