Welcome to this month’s EU & UK Data Protection Bulletin covering developments from February and March.
In this edition, recent highlights include:
Use the links below to navigate through our newsletter:
ICO
Data analytics toolkit launched
The toolkit is aimed at those using software to automatically discover patterns in data sets containing personal data – including use of AI (but not limited to this). The toolkit asks a series of questions to give guidance on lawfulness of processing; accountability and governance; data protection principles and data subject rights. The output is in the form of a report with tailored advice. ICO advises that use of the toolkit is anonymous and that ICO cannot view the information submitted to it.
New Guidance on Political Campaigning
ICO has published its final guidance on this, following a public consultation launched in October 2019. The Guidance summarises the impact of existing laws on political campaigning: it does not change the law.
Read more here >
Digital Regulation Co-operation Forum publishes first annual plan of work
The Forum consists of the Competition and Markets Authority, ICO and Ofcom. As from April 2021, the Financial Conduct Authority will join the Forum.
Read more here >
ICO announces plan to update anonymisation guidance
Ali Shah, the ICO’s Head of Technology Policy, has blogged about the ICO’s plan to update its anonymisation guidance. ICO is interested in engaging with experts ahead of public consultation
True Vision Productions v Information Commissioner [2021] UKFTT 2019 EA 0170
The case is useful in showing how exemptions in data protection legislation relating to processing of personal data for journalistic purposes should be applied. The First Tier Tribunal found that filming of mothers – at the moment they received a diagnosis that their unborn child had died – breached data protection legislation because the filming was carried out without notice, whereas notice could have been provided.
Koypo Laboratories Limited v Information Commissioner [2021] UKFTT EA/2020/0263P
This case relates to an appeal against a monetary penalty issued by the ICO in August 2020 relating to a breach of Regulation 22 of PECR.
Read more here >
Weaver and others v British Airways plc [2021] EWHC 217 (QB)
Data protection claims are one of the driving forces behind the ongoing debate concerning the way group actions are conducted in the UK. This recent High Court decision was made after a costs and case management conference in the group litigation which follows the high-profile British Airways data breach.
Read more here >
Phones 4U LTD (In Administration) v EE Ltd & 7 ORS
After going into administration in 2014, Phones 4U brought a competition claim against a number of mobile phone companies alleging anti-competitive behaviour. It claimed that the defendants forced it into administration by colluding to terminate their contracts. It submitted that current and former employees of the defendants had used their personal devices to collude.
Read more here >
Leave.EU Group Ltd (2) Eldon Insurance Services Ltd v Information Commissioner
The Upper Tribunal rejected all arguments by Leave.EU and Eldon Insurance Services against enforcement action taken against them in relation to newsletters about Brexit which also contained advertising material about GoSkippy insurance products.
Read more here >
HRH Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers [2021] EWHC 273 (Ch)
This High Court judgment relates to a letter sent by the Duchess of Sussex to her father which was reproduced in large parts in articles published by the Associated Newspapers in the Mail on Sunday and MailOnline.
Read more here >
Collette Lloyd v Information Commissioner
Collette Lloyd made a Freedom of Information request to Airedale NHS Foundation Trust i.a. for the numbers of live births per year of children with Down Syndrome. The Trust explained that it was a small NHS Trust and that numbers would be below 5 per year. Accordingly, it concluded that release of the data would amount to disclosure of personal data and that this meant that it should not provide the information. The Information Commissioner agreed with the Trust. Ms Lloyd appealed against this decision.