Formalised Pre-Grant Third Party Observations and Post-Grant Re-Examination in Singapore

Written By

huileng tan module
Hui Leng Tan

Senior Patent Attorney
Singapore

I work as a senior patent attorney in Bird & Bird's Intellectual Property & Technology Group in Singapore, where I specialise in life sciences. I work with a broad range of clients, from local SMEs to foreign MNCs.

Proposed changes to the Singapore patents regime to formalise pre-grant third party observations and to introduce post-grant re-examination were first discussed around 2017. These changes will now be introduced in the Patents Rules from 1 October 2021. What do these changes mean for third parties and patent applicants?

From 1 October 2021, third parties will be able to submit formal third-party observations (“TPOs”) in connection with the patentability of a pending patent application, and a request for re-examination can also be filed for a granted patent in Singapore.

Formalising the pre-grant TPOs process means that, if TPOs are filed, an Examiner will be obliged to review the TPOs during the search and/or examination or supplementary examination of a patent application and to indicate this in the Written Opinion, Search and/or Examination Report or Supplementary Examination Report, whichever is applicable. If the TPOs are found by the Examiner to be relevant to the patentability of the patent application and consequently, objections are raised in a Written Opinion, a patent applicant can formally respond to the Written Opinion in accordance with the prescribed procedures. TPOs may be filed at any time before the…

Full article available on PatentHub

Latest insights

More Insights
train passing through trees

Patent Litigation in Practice Series: Spotlight on Singapore: The Simplified Process vs Express Track in Singapore

Nov 12 2024

Read More
Aeroplane on tarmac

Women in Tech: At the forefront of innovation - Key takeaways from Andrea Wu, Urban-Air Port

Nov 12 2024

Read More
Curiosity line green background

Bed, bath & actually not misleading after all – the Full Court unanimously overturned the primary judge’s finding that “HOUSE BED & BATH” was misleading

Nov 11 2024

Read More