Denmark: Volvo transaction not in need of repairs despite high market shares

Written By

alexander brochner Module
Alexander Brøchner

Associate
Denmark

I'm an associate in our international Competition & EU group in Denmark, advising both national and international clients on Danish and EU competition law.

morten nissen Module
Morten Nissen

Partner
Denmark

I'm a partner and co-head of our international Competition & EU group. I also lead the Competition & EU team in Denmark. I have a particular focus on applying competition & EU law as a tool to achieve specific and measurable business objectives for our clients.

The Danish Competition Council (‘DCC’) has, following an in-depth investigation, approved Volvo Danmark A/S’ (‘Volvo Danmark’) acquisition of Titan Lastvogne A/S (‘Titan’) in spite of post-transaction market shares exceeding 50%.

Volvo Danmark is the Danish importer of Volvo and Renault trucks and is active within both retail and wholesale of these trucks, as well as sale of Volvo and Renault branded spare parts to authorised resellers.

Prior to the acquisition four separate authorised resellers were active in Denmark. These resellers were respectively Volvo Danmark’s own vertically integrated reseller and three independent resellers, including Titan.

Only Volvo Danmark’s own vertically integrated reseller and Titan were active in the Eastern region of Denmark, including the island Zealand.

With its decision, the DCC approved the acquisition without remedies, even though this transaction will, in certain relevant markets including the market for reparation and maintenance of Volvo- and Renault trucks, strengthen Volvo Danmark’s market share from levels already exceeding 50%.

Of special relevance for the assessment by the DCC was that the relevant counterfactual scenario for this transaction was not an assessment of the status quo absent the transaction. Instead, the DCC noted that Volvo Danmark had already prior to the acquisition terminated Titan’s authorisation as a reseller and repairer of Volvo and Renault trucks, and that this decision to terminate the authorisation was not dependent on the closing of the acquisition.

Consequently, the relevant counterfactual scenario on which the assessment should be based was a scenario, where Titan would only continue to function as an independent repairer of trucks, and not as an authorised reseller and repairer.

The DCC therefore concluded that while the post-transaction market shares held by Volvo Danmark entailed a risk of price increases for repairs of Volvo and Renault trucks, this risk was not increased as a direct result of the acquisition. Instead, Volvo Danmark's market shares would have been increased to such levels regardless of the transaction.

The press release concerning the clearance decision by the DCC is accessible here.

For more information, please contact Morten Nissen or Alexander Brøchner and visit our Competition & EU homepage.

Latest insights

More Insights

California’s AI bill vs. the EU AI Act: a cross-continental analysis of AI regulations

Nov 06 2024

Read More
Keyboard and tablet on yellow background

New consumer rights in the Polish Electronic Communications Law

3 min Nov 05 2024

Read More
Competition and EU

Competitive Edge: Competition & EU Law - FDI special edition - October 2024

Oct 30 2024

Read More