France: Once again, the leniency procedure has brought to light a compote cartel but the initial sanction has been drastically reduced

The case started in January 2014 with a leniency application by Coroos, a Dutch fruit and vegetable manufacturer. The Coroos group benefited from a total fine exemption under the leniency procedure for its cooperation during the investigation. The same cannot be said for the other participants in this French national dimension cartel that lasted from October 2010 to January 2014. In October 2022, the Paris Court of Appeal confirmed the conviction of the main French compote manufacturers for price fixing and market sharing, but drastically reduced the initial sanction by almost half.

The French Competition Authority's decision (decision No 19-D-24, December 17th 2019)


Following the leniency application and dawn raids, the French Competition Authority found that between October 2010 and January 2014, the cartel members decided to set up a comprehensive plan to increase the selling prices of compotes to retailers, to agree on a common discourse justifying these price increases, and finally, to share out the volumes and customers. The investigation revealed that the cartel covered a very large share of the markets. The French Competition Authority fined the companies €58.3 million.

The partial reversal of the decision (Paris Court of Appeal, Octobre 6th 2022, No 20/01494)

The Paris Court of Appeal confirmed the practices sanctioned but reformed the decision regarding the duration of the individual participation of the companies in the cartel. This led to a change in the reference year for the calculation of the penalty and explains the significant decrease in the penalty. In addition, the Court adjusted the considerations retained by the Authority regarding the seriousness of the practices and the damage to the economy.

Finally, the overall amount imposed on the members of the cartel was reduced by almost 50% bringing the penalty to €31 million.

Bird & Bird Paris represented Conserves France in this case.

For more information, please contact Claire Burlin.

VISIT OUR COMPETITION & EU HOMEPAGE

 


Latest insights

More Insights
Yellow curiosity line

Data Centre & Environmental Impact Assessment procedures: MASE guidelines and Environmental Law Decree no. 153/2024

Nov 07 2024

Read More

California’s AI bill vs. the EU AI Act: a cross-continental analysis of AI regulations

Nov 06 2024

Read More
Keyboard and tablet on yellow background

New consumer rights in the Polish Electronic Communications Law

3 min Nov 05 2024

Read More