Vernacare in the UK Court of Appeal: Invention obvious even if disclosure does not cover all benefits of invention

Written By

ning ning li module
Ning-Ning Li

Senior Associate
UK

As an associate in our London-based Intellectual Property Group, I have expertise in a broad range of IP rights including patents, trade marks and designs, with a particular focus on the life sciences sector.

The Court of Appeal recently overturned the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court’s findings on validity and infringement in one of the patents involved in Vernacare v Moulded Fibre Products. Key to its decision was a judgment that had not been raised in the IPEC, Hallen v Brabantia, the leading case on ‘bonus’ effects of inventions.

At first instance, the IPEC’s finding that the defendant (“MFP”) did not infringe by equivalence because the patent would have been invalid if it had that scope (the ‘Formstein’ defence) was a notable feature which remains unaffected as it was not appealed.

Background

The case concerned disposable washbowls for use in healthcare settings. These washbowls are made from paper pulp, mixed with other ingredients including “sizing agents” (additives which improve qualities such as waterproofing) and biocides, moulded into shape.

Two of Vernacare’s patents were considered at first instance. The first concerned the shape of the washbowl, with the patent found valid but not infringed by the defendant’s washbowl (this part of the judgment was not appealed).

The second, patent GB 24 39 947 (the “947 Patent”) covered the addition of fluorocarbons among the sizing agents to provide protection from detergents which might otherwise degrade the washbowl during use. The IPEC found this patent valid and infringed. The appeal related to the judge’s findings that claims 1 and 9 of the 947 Patent were valid.

Hallen enters play

MFP argued that the IPEC judge had incorrectly defined the inventive concept by introducing an illegitimate purpose-based…

Full article available on PatentHub

Latest insights

More Insights
featured image

Applications for provisional measures before the UPC – what may be granted?

5 minutes Mar 31 2025

Read More
featured image

UAE announces initiatives to enhance intellectual property protection for circular economy technologies and broader patent registrations

2 minutes Mar 28 2025

Read More
featured image

English Court of Appeal uphold decision declaring that MSD had used “Merck” in breach of Court Order

3 minutes Mar 28 2025

Read More