Report of Trade Mark Cases For the CIPA Journal October 2024
Written By
Associate
UK
I am an associate in our Intellectual Property department, specialising in brand management.
Partner
UK
I am fascinated by IP and the challenge of helping my clients protect, exploit and defend their IP rights to further their business objectives.
Associate
UK
I am a newly-qualified Associate in our Intellectual Property department, based in London, with a focus on contentious matters.
Related
Practices
Sectors
We report on the Court of Appeal’s decision in TVIS v Howserv Services, which found that errors had been made in the assessment of conceptual similarity, distinctiveness, and the approach to evidence of actual confusion. We also report on the High Court’s judgment in Athleta (ITM) v Sports Group Denmark, where trade mark infringement was found for sufficiently distinctive marks and dismissed for weakly distinctive marks. A passing off claim was also dismissed. We also report on Unicorn Studio v Veronese, in which the High Court ruled that an opposition should have failed – the hearing officer should have looked at the overall question of similarity. Finally, we report on Industrial Cleaning Equipment (Southampton) v Intelligent Cleaning Equipment where the Court of Appeal departed from the CJEU’s Budvar decision and held that for statutory acquiescence, the earlier mark’s owner only needs to be aware of the use of the later mark, not its registration, for time to start running.
