The French Data Protection Authority (“CNIL”) has long been known for its active enforcement efforts of cookies and similar technologies (“cookies”) rules.
In this article, we explore CNIL’s enforcement actions in the last years and how your organisation should respond to each of the issues raised by the CNIL, if you have a French presence. The CNIL’s recent €50 million fine for breaches of e-Privacy rules and crackdown on misleading cookie banners has reinforced the importance of complying with such rules.
Between December 2022 and December 2024, the CNIL issued combined fines of over €139 million for breaches of Article 82 of the French Data Protection Act, which implements Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. This relates to the rules surrounding the use of cookies, when storing or accessing information on user devices.
1. Placement/reading of cookies prior to obtaining user consent
How to respond: To be exempted from seeking user consent, you need to ensure that you only place/read cookies which are either (a) used for the sole purpose of carrying out or facilitating the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network or (b) strictly necessary in order to provide an information society service explicitly requested by the user.
The CNIL has published the following list of exempt cookies that do not require consent:
2. Be prudent when users change their minds
How to respond: If you have placed cookies with the user's consent, and the user subsequently withdraws his consent, you must implement measures to prevent the continued reading of those (previously accepted) cookies.
This is in line with the CNIL's recommendations where the CNIL specified that “for the withdrawal of consent to be effective, it may be necessary to implement specific solutions to guarantee the absence of reading or writing of previously used tracers.”
In its decision SAN-2024-019, the CNIL indicates that “these solutions can, for example, consist in modifying the lifetime of cookies to indicate that they have expired (by returning an appropriate “set cookie” header in an http response, specifying an expiry date in the past), which will lead to their deletion by the browser, or, in the case of cookies that do not have the “httpOnly” attribute, ensuring their deletion using a script run locally on the terminal, via the use of web browsers' “cookie” application programming interfaces.”
3. Consent not as easy to refuse as to give
How to respond: Make it as simple to withdraw consent as to give it. In its recommendations, the CNIL provides two ways to comply with this obligation: a “refuse all” button or a “continue without accepting” button (usually placed at the top right end corner of the banner). Note that such interpretation only applies to France and other EU data protection authorities might not share the same view.
4. Certain multi-purpose cookies can require dissociation or users’ prior consent
A multi-purpose cookie refers to situations where for instance one purpose of the cookie (i) fall within the scope of the consent exemptions (e.g. cookies used for the security of the service/authentication of users) and a second purpose of that same cookie (ii) requires users’ prior consent (e.g. advertising purposes).
The CNIL found that when combining purposes in a single cookie, if some of those purposes are not exempt from consent, prior consent is required. This follows the CNIL’s cookies guidelines[3] where it says that the use of the same cookie for several purposes, some of which are not exempted from consent, requires the users’ prior consent (see Article 5). The CNIL has flagged that the use of reCAPTCHA cookies (if mixing security purposes with other purposes subject to consent requirements) would fall in this category.
How to respond: Ensure that where multi-purpose cookies are used for both exempted purposes and purposes requiring prior consent, such cookies are either dissociated or treated overall as cookies which require users’ prior consent.
5. Lack of granularity
The CNIL found that it is not enough to state that cookies are placed for analysis and marketing purposes and to improve the user’s website experience as the term “analysis” does not identify the purpose of the analysis nor establish the difference with the purpose attached to the words “to improve your experience on our websites.”
The CNIL also found that the collection of information on users' "browsing habits" to offer them advertisements prevented these advertisements from being qualified as "non-personalised" and that the information provided should match the actual processing carried out.
How to respond: Ensure that the information provided to users in the cookies banner is sufficiently precise to allow users to give informed consent. For instance, avoid using vague labels (e.g., ‘improve your experience of the website’ or ‘help improve our services’) as they do not provide users with sufficient information about the purposes of the cookies.
6. Misleading cookie banners
In December 2024, the CNIL highlighted that in response to numerous complaints from individuals, it issued formal notices to several website publishers, asking them to make changes to their misleading cookie consent banners (see here in French).
The non-compliant practices observed include the following:
If you have any questions or want to explore how these positions impact your business, please get in touch with Gabriel Voisin or Mihnea Dumitrascu.
[1] For this decision, the CNIL has not distinguished between the amount of the fine for breaches of Article 82 and the amount for other breaches.
[2] The cookies placed without consent included third-party cookies.