Canada's CIPO Launches Pilot Project to Enforce Section 45 of the Trade Marks Act: What It Means for Trademark Owners

Written By

paola ruggiero Module
Paola Ruggiero

Counsel
Italy

As Counsel here at Bird & Bird, I have broad experience in Italian and European IP law, representing our clients from industries including food, fashion, entertainment, media, retail, finance and insurance, in trade mark, copyright and design matters.

The Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) has launched a pilot project aimed at randomly executing Section 45 of the Canadian Trademarks Act.

Section 45 allows anyone to request the removal of a trademark registration from the Register of Trademarks if the owner is unable to show use of the trademark in Canada during the three-year period preceding the date of the Section 45 notice.

In other words, the Office is using the expungement/non-use proceedings as a tool to ensure that the Register will reflect the registrations that are effectively in use for the protected goods and services.

For the purpose of the pilot project, the Office will randomly select the marks to be addressed among: (i) registrations based on use, (ii) registrations based on proposed use for which a declaration of use was filed, (iii) registrations based on use and registration abroad, (iv) registrations with multiple bases and, last but not least, (v) registrations that have been on the Register for more than three years.

The notice will be notified to the owner of the trademark and to its representative; the registered owner has three months from the date of the Section 45 notice to file its evidence with the Registrar.

In case the owner is unable to file evidence for all or some of the listed goods and services, the registration will be entirely or partially expunged from the Register.

After two rounds of notices served between January and March 2025, the CIPO will proceed to gather feedback, including whether it will discontinue this practice or not.

Trademark owners should assess if their registrations are properly used in Canada according to the relevant law and practice and ensure an adequate record-keeping of the evidence to avoid the loss of their worthwhile registrations.

Authors: Paola Ruggiero and Sara Consorti

Latest insights

More Insights
stethoscope

EPO Board of Appeal Decides Pig/Human Chimera Patent Offends Human Dignity

Feb 17 2025

Read More
camera

“Shambles” TV show format not protected by copyright as a dramatic work

Feb 12 2025

Read More
Curiosity line teal background

ACCC's sweeping investigation exposes dubious e-commerce returns

Feb 07 2025

Read More