Australian market regulators cracking down on greenwashing

Written By

jonathon ellis Module
Jonathon Ellis

Partner
Australia

I'm a dispute resolution and regulatory investigations partner in our Sydney office. I work with clients to solve complex issues facing their businesses, whether that is a commercial dispute or engagement with regulatory agencies.

jonathan tay Module
Jonathan Tay

Senior Associate
Australia

I am a senior associate in the Dispute Resolution team in Sydney. <BR/><BR/>I provide succinct, solutions orientated advice to help our clients solve complex problems, mitigate future risks and develop strategies to simplify their decision-making process.

On 27 October 2022, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) announced that it had taken its first formal action against an entity involved in greenwashing.

The entity in question, ASX listed Tlou Energy Limited (Tlou), was said to have made false and misleading statements to the market in relation to the ecological impact of its energy producing activities. Tlou was issued four infringement notices and paid $53,280 in fines.

This enforcement action follows a suite of public announcements made by ASIC and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) regarding the regulatory bodies’ intent to crack down on misleading claims regarding greenwashing.

As a reminder, greenwashing involves the misrepresenting of the extent to which a company, product, service or investment strategy is environmentally friendly, sustainable or ethical.

ASIC and the ACCC have the power to commence action against entities that:

  • engage in conduct that is misleading, deceptive or is likely to mislead or deceive; or
  • make false or misleading representations,

with respect to greenwashing under the and the ASIC Act [1] (for the supply of financial services or financial products) and the Australian Consumer Law [2] (ACL) (for the supply of goods and services), respectively.

Importantly, these consumer protection laws operate extraterritorially and apply to entities that carry on business in Australia, irrespective of their place of incorporation. [3]

For all overseas and domestic entities that do business in Australia, now is the time to review your marketing and consumer-facing material to ensure that any representations contained therein are free from greenwashing.


ASIC Act

ACL

The greater of:

  • 50,000 penalty units (currently $11.1 million);
  • 3 times the benefit derived and detriment avoided; or
  • 10% of the annual turnover of the body corporate for the previous 12 months (up to a maximum of 2.5 million penalty units, or A$555 million)

The greater of:

  • AU$50 million; or
  • three times the value of the benefit received from the conduct; or
  • 30 per cent of the company’s adjusted turnover for the breach turnover period.

 

Greenwashing practices that breach these consumer protection laws expose businesses to civil liability and severe maximum penalties as set out in the following table.

On top of these penalties, ASIC and the ACCC may name and shame entities that have engaged in greenwashing as a means to deter future conduct. Such action places contravening entities at serious risk of reputational harm.

To avoid breaches of these consumer protection laws, businesses should ensure that any environmental or sustainability claims they make are able to be supported by fact. Should your business require advice on how to mitigate these risks and to ensure compliance with such consumer protection laws, please reach out to your usual Bird & Bird contacts.



[1] See ss 12DA and 12DB of the ASIC Act.

[2] See ss 18 and 29 of the ACL.

[3] Note: ss 1041E, 1041G and 1041H the Corporations Act also applies to businesses that engage in greenwashing practices, although they do not apply extraterritorially.