Reports of Trade Mark Cases for CIPA November 2020

In this month’s report, we look at the High Court’s decision in Sazerac Brands, LLC & Anr v Liverpool Gin Distillery Ltd & Anr [2020] EWHC 2424 (Ch), where Fancourt J rules on the likelihood of confusion and unfair advantage relating to a premium product. We also report on the distinctiveness of signs applied to specific goods in Aktiebolaget Östgötatrafiken v Patent- och registreringsverket (CJ; C 456/19) and summarise the findings on the likelihood of confusion in Decathlon v EUIPO; Athlon Custom Sportswear PC (T-349/19).

Latest insights

More Insights
Snow-capped mountain range

Five Key Considerations for M&A in the Retail and Consumer Sector

Jun 28 2024

Read More
Curiosity line yellow background

Are you ready for Hong Kong’s Cybersecurity law?

Jun 28 2024

Read More
City skyline at dusk

Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 – Implications of the UK Act for Australian companies

Jun 28 2024

Read More