Update on Merger Control Filing under New Anti-Monopoly Law in China

Written By

svenmichael werner module
Sven-Michael Werner

Partner
China

I am a partner in the international Corporate Group based in Shanghai and have been living and working in China since 1999, and based in Shanghai since 2003. I have close to 20 years' experience practising law in China.

An amendment to the Anti-Monopoly Law (AML) of China came into force on the 1 August 2022. The Amendment sets out changes and improvements to the merger control filing regime together with the Regulations on the Examination of Concentration of Business Operators (Draft for Comment) (ECBO).

I. Threshold for Merger Control Filing

According to Article 25(3) of the AML, the first condition triggering a merger control filing is that an operator obtains control over other operators through contracts or other means, or can exert decisive influence over other operators.

The draft ECBO further elaborates on the elements of “exert decisive influence”:

  1. Holding direct or indirect voting rights or similar interests in other business operators;
  2. Influence on the appointment and dismissal of other business operators;
  3. Influence on financial budget of other business operators;
  4. Influence on business situation of other business operators;
  5. Influence on other aspects of operation and management of other business operators.

Further, the threshold for declaration has been raised. An obligation to declare will now be triggered in China if:

  1. the individual turnover in China of at least two undertakings exceeds CNY 800 million (2021: approx. US$124 million) in the preceding financial year; and
  2. the combined turnover of all undertakings exceeds CNY 12 billion (2021: approx. US$1.86 billion) on a global basis and/or CNY 4 billion (2021: approx. US$620 million) within China.

The raising of the threshold will ease anti-monopoly compliance pressure for mergers of small and medium-sized enterprises, help facilitate investments and reduce transaction costs.

Of particular note with regards to killer acquisitions, when merging of business operators does not meet the reporting standards prescribed by the State Council, but there is evidence showing competition may be eliminated or restricted, the anti-monopoly law enforcement agency of the State Council may require the business operators to declare.

II. Gun-jumping

Business operators failing to declare business mergers where mandated will be subject to fines up to ten times higher under the new AML compared to the previous level.

III. Stop the Clock

Article 32 of the AML formally establishes a “Stop the Clock” system. In future, the AML enforcement agency may suspend the determination of merger thresholds where there is:

  • Delayed or incomplete documentation submitted;
  • Changed circumstances material to the merger; or
  • Negotiation over pemedy proposals.

For more information, please contact Serena Du or Sven-Michael Werner and visit our Competition & EU homepage.

Latest insights

More Insights

California’s AI bill vs. the EU AI Act: a cross-continental analysis of AI regulations

Nov 06 2024

Read More
Keyboard and tablet on yellow background

New consumer rights in the Polish Electronic Communications Law

3 min Nov 05 2024

Read More
Competition and EU

Competitive Edge: Competition & EU Law - FDI special edition - October 2024

Oct 30 2024

Read More